Groups
In-Group Bias
We tend to favour our group over others
48 teenagers were divided into 2 groups based on expressing a preference for a painting. They were then told to anonymously award money to other participants involved in the study.
The results demonstrated that when given a choice between maximising profit for all groups and maximising profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
In-Group favouritism can take many forms.
For instance, designers might feel they are the out-group in a meeting dominated by engineers, creating a sense that they're either not as welcomed or have opinions that aren't as valued. Who might be feeling excluded in your projects and meetings?
Turn “Us vs Them” into “We”.
Broaden the perception of group boundaries by cooperating with the out-group in shared activities (Gaertner et al., 1990). Which situations can you create that promote collaboration?
Actively use the benefits of your outgroup.
We tend to evaluate the work of our own group as better and more creative than it really is. However, by enlisting the aid of an out-group, you may have an accurate assessment of the actual creative value (Adarves‐Yorno, 2008).
Be careful with unconscious bias.
Groups can be formed by meaningless reasons but also by our own pre-conceived notions or bias. What might be some of the reasons you or others use to place someone in an out-group? How might you raise this in a way to bring disconnected groups together?
Conversion
Ownership Bias
We value things more when we feel we own them
218 people were split into 3 groups, given either a coffee mug or a chocolate bar and told they could swap their item for the other; or given neither and told they could choose either.
Those who’d been endowed with either item were far more likely to stick with it than those who were given neither.
Perceived ownership is powerful, allowing consumers to attribute increased value and emotional connection on what you’re offering, creating a strong desire to buy that increases over time.
It’s driven by a price gap between how much we’re willing to pay for an item and the price we’re willing to sell it for. This is due to a mix of Loss Aversion, Framing (i.e. buyer or seller) and the evolutionary advantage of overvaluing our tradable possessions. Doing so increases our resources and chances of survival.
Allow people to feel ownership of a product prior to purchase. Examples include: making it effortless to add that product to their basket, visually personalizing a product early in the ordering process, highlighting how soon it could be at your door or allowing free week-long test drives of that car you’ve always wanted.
Product Development
Sunk Cost Bias
We’re unable to let go of our past bad investments, even if it makes sense to do so
108 people were told they were the head of an airline that was either 90% complete on a $10m plane project, or shown an equivalent $1m proposal to research and develop this plane. In both cases, a competitor had created a similar plane of superior quality.
In either case, should they still invest the $1m? Those in the 90% sunk cost condition were far more likely to keep on spending than those who had yet to invest anything.
Remind consumers of past personal efforts or the amount of time spent with the brand to increase feelings of a sunk cost. Reframing past efforts as incomplete or as ongoing progress will also induce the effect and assist sales.
Test your product ideas sooner using a more agile product methodology. This will minimize time, cost and effort wasted on unproven potential failures to which you will become increasingly attached, especially if you’re personally accountable for their success.
Take 15 mins for mindfulness practice - focusing on the present moment and less on the past and future - to increase your resistance to the Sunk Cost bias. (Hafenbrack et al., 2013). Check out the Headspace app.
Conversion
Reactance
We’ll do the opposite from what we’re asked if we’re pushed too hard
84 people were shown an ad for a known clothing brand that they either had an existing loyalty to or not, written either assertively or not. Based upon the ad, they were then asked how much from a $25 gift card they'd spend.
People spent less money after viewing an assertive ad next to a non-assertive ad, especially when loyal.
Don’t misuse behavioural principles.
We've seen a rising use of faux-scarcity to create an uneasy sense of urgency as well as an aggressive use of Defaults that aren't in customers' best interests. Such applications turn positive activities, like booking a holiday into ones riddled with stress.
Give some control (Miller et al., 2007).
Having a feeling of choice can reduce feelings that our freedoms are being taken away. Mix Autonomy with Certainty by reminding of the inevitability ahead while granting other areas where you can give back control in meaningful ways.
Give lots of warning up-front
If you're planning a big change that will clearly trigger reactance (Richards and Banas, 2015), giving time for the news to sink in, let people familiarise themselves with the new, uncomfortable normal will then reduce reactance when the change does come about.
Product Development
Risk Aversion
We don’t like uncertainty and generally stick to what we know
11k people were offered a new job that had a 50% chance of doubling income for life, but it wasn't without risk, with an equal chance of it falling by either 20, 33 or 50%. Questioning started with the 33% gamble; if people took it, they were asked if they’d take the bigger 50% gamble too. But if they didn’t, they were asked about the smaller 20% one.
Results put people into four risk categories showing the majority were not willing to take any risk at all.
Focus on an improvement metric.
We prefer the certainty of what we’re used to, so the benefits of switching to a new product need to feel substantial.
Outline a goal (relative performance, efficiency etc.) to anchor your product strategy around.
Doing so will reduce uncertainty and boost comparisons against better-known, lower risk alternatives.
Offer a trial or free sample...
...to create familiarity and reduce the risk around a new product.
This sets the cost of new product usage at zero, during which the consumer will adjust their future preferences.
Utilize your brand umbrella.
For any new sub-brands, reduce risk by clearly indicating the relationship to existing, familiar brands you own (Erdem, 1998).
Product brands take note. Risk aversion is higher for material purchases than for experiential ones such as restaurant meals or holidays (Roche et al., 2015).
Product Development
Availability Bias
Our judgements are heavily influenced by what comes to mind more easily
36 medical students were first asked to diagnose six clinical cases (Phase 1). They were then asked to diagnose a further eight, four of which were similar to Phase 1, but were actually different (Phase 2). Their accuracy for successful diagnosis was rated out of four.
Average diagnosis scores were 17.5% lower for Phase 2 cases that were similar to those in Phase 1.
Create pre-experiences.
During product development sessions, prime attendees with prototypes to first tell a detailed story of an imagined future. This will increase innovative ideas by reducing both incremental thinking (Liedtka, 2015) and inferior ideas brought about through Ownership Bias and any Sunk Costs.
Conduct reflective reviews.
After results are in from product experiments, reviewing the specific causes behind both failures and successes is critical. This will help you understand any assumptions or misdiagnosis brought about by merely relying on what comes easily to mind (Ellis and Davidi, 2005).
Include real customers in retrospectives.
Combining reflective reviews with real customer feedback will boost team performance (Schollaert, 2009) and help suppress the perils of your team's own Confirmation Bias.
Experience
Friction
We’re less likely to complete a task with each step added
733 new employees of a health company used a single opt-in process to subscribe to a retirement plan. Results were compared to a multi-step phone process used with 455 and 407 employees from the two previous years.
Participation rates were 5% after one month and 8% after three months. With the new process, they rose to 19% and 35% respectively.
Perform a friction audit.
Identify all the hurdles and delays your user may feel while using your product and attempt to minimise them. How many barriers to a near-effortless user experience can you find?
Adding friction can help people from making mistakes.
Add barriers to counter System 1 mode, prompting users for conscious reflection to validate important information (e.g. monetary transactions). What strategic friction can you create?
Add friction to make waiting times feel shorter.
Houston airport reduced the number of luggage waiting times complaints by moving the luggage area further away so that passengers spent more time walking and less time waiting.
Remove friction but highlight effort.
Our willingness to pay for something increases by knowing how much work is done for us. We pay more for a cup of coffee if we see the barista working on it for several minutes.
Experience
Measurement Paradox
We enjoy experiences less when we track them
With the rise of wearable devices, personal quantification is easier than ever. It's not a surprise that self-tracking has a large adherence in a competitive, comparative culture where the individual is constantly improving his performance in every possible measure.
But it has a cost.
One of the responsibilities of product creators is to understand and examine the resultant behaviours that modifications to the product design will trigger. By adding certain features or changing their salience, you will inevitably change the behavioural dynamics.
It’s well studied that external rewards undermine intrinsic motivation, but now we know that the act of tracking can also impact it by reminding us of the output, making the activities seem like work. Thus, not everything that can be measured should be measured.
Peter Drucker said “What gets measured gets managed, even when it’s pointless to measure and manage it, and even if it harms the purpose of the organization to do so”.
It’s a warning from the father of management that it’s not often taken to heart, and this study reminds us of it.
With the rise of wearable devices, personal quantification is easier than ever. It's not a surprise that self-tracking has a large adherence in a competitive, comparative culture where the individual is constantly improving his performance in every possible measure.
But it has a cost.
One of the responsibilities of product creators is to understand and examine the resultant behaviours that modifications to the product design will trigger. By adding certain features or changing their salience, you will inevitably change the behavioural dynamics.
It’s well studied that external rewards undermine intrinsic motivation, but now we know that the act of tracking can also impact it by reminding us of the output, making the activities seem like work. Thus, not everything that can be measured should be measured.
Peter Drucker said “What gets measured gets managed, even when it’s pointless to measure and manage it, and even if it harms the purpose of the organization to do so”.
It’s a warning from the father of management that it’s not often taken to heart, and this study reminds us of it.
95 university students spent the day leisurely walking. In the measurement group they were given the choice to wear a pedometer. In the control group, everyone used a sealed shut pedometer. Afterwards, they rated how much they enjoyed walking.
Measuring led participants to walk more but decreased how much they enjoyed it – even for those who chose to be measured.
Consider what you want your users to feel.
While measurement may improve performance, it comes at the expense of enjoyment. By adding a measurement option, the behaviour will feel like work instead of fun.
Understand why users engage in an activity when deciding whether to measure it.
Sometimes the benefit of achieving more may outweigh the cost of users enjoying the experience. Does the end you’re looking to achieve justify the means of measuring its progress?
Switch the motivation type by becoming pro-social and giving meaning to the measurement.
For example: If you reduce your calories, you could send the equivalent of those excess calories to someone in need of food.
Prior data can set reference points that demotivate us
Our personal motivation can suffer in the face of prior data, setting unhelpful reference points about future expected efforts.
For instance, consider the following: "I can see that I ran 10k 3 times in a row, so if I don't run 10k this time, I feel that I'm doing worse. But I just don't feel like I can do 10k today, so I won't go at all."
However, in absolute terms, you're doing more in total by doing any more running at all, whether that's 1k, or even 100m, so you're best off ignoring the data and doing *something*.
A good counterbalance to this is to focus instead on the *experience* that running provides. This removes the quantifiable reference point and frees us to just enjoy the act for what it is. And who knows, maybe we'll end up running longer than 10k in the process!
Product Development
Analysis Paralysis
Our capacity to process information and make decisions reduces with each made
42 people were either asked to make 35 'A or B' choices that would inform the design of an educational course they were attending, or instead to just read the course material. Both were then tasked with solving math puzzles and were timed until they gave up.
Those who had to make the choices beforehand persisted for less time on the puzzles and also got fewer right.
Protect your decision capacity.
Prioritize your day around and take breaks before making harder decisions. For example, restaurant inspectors can reduce errors by scrutinizing sites at higher risk of failure at the start of the day (Ibanez & Toffel, 2017).
Create product contrast.
When no option in a set offers a distinct advantage from the others, we're most at risk of not choosing at all (Dhar, 1997). How can you improve your choice architecture to offer variety that actually makes deciding easier?
Order matters for revenue.
Prospective Audi owners given a high number of customization options early on more readily accepted, higher-priced defaults in later steps (Levav, 2010). Though be careful not to trigger Reactance by pre-selecting defaults that are seen as too expensive.
Experience
Present Bias
What we want now is often the opposite of what we aspire to in the future
195 students were asked to fill out a lunch order survey in return for a free lunch. They were split into two groups and asked either a few hours prior to or just before lunchtime.
Those asked with the delay made food choices 11% lower in calories than those just before lunch.
Adapt with time-to-delivery.
Online grocers could change what’s shown to the user based on how many days out their delivery slot is, showing more aspirational goods in the week prior and impulsive goods the day before.
Build around customers’ goals.
Have them make a preference on your site for their future self i.e. that they want to lose weight or save more money this year. Then, have this preference dictate what products are shown to them online, along with a subtle reminder that you’re helping with their bigger goals.
Encourage “future lock-ins.”
Banks could improve consumer savings by allowing pre-registration for a future savings account. Consider locking in other types of ‘should’ decisions that will benefit the consumer’s future well-being, as well as reducing your costs through better demand forecasting.
Experience
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
88 students were told about an exercise training camp and split into 2 groups: either having a choice about the four fitness programs on offer or having one randomly assigned. They were then asked to rate their anticipated satisfaction of the program out of 9.
Those given some autonomy reported higher levels of anticipated satisfaction than those who weren’t.
Choice = autonomy = certainty.
For instance, giving people a choice to still use the old version of your software platform for a given timeframe will reduce anxiety and uncertainty.
Product type matters.
People desire autonomy for pleasure purchases (i.e. vacations) more than for practical ones (i.e. business trips).
Place more focus on the former in order to maximise feelings of control and consumer satisfaction (Botti & McGill, 2011).
Change behavior with the ‘4As’.
Feeling that any change originated from within is vital.
Ask about the behavior, advise them impartially of the facts and of better routes, but that they must make their own choice.
If keen to change, assist them to make a commitment to do so by a given date, and arrange a follow-up to support this behavior change.
Experience
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Whilst we all like to think we make rational, optimal decisions, sometimes, our impulses get the better of us.
In an attempt to preserve our cognitive capacity, we make what’s called fast, reactionary “System 1” judgements.
These might not be very good at all for us.
Let me explain.
Consider you’re stressed out after a long day, and launch your favourite social media app to unwind. You see someone sharing a wild conspiracy theory that you know to be untrue.
You’re angry, and quickly write out a frustrated comment that criticises this person, using strong language that would offend.
At this point, hitting “send” would cause a lot of damage you can’t come back from.
This is where our slower “System 2” thinking becomes vital.
Here, reflective thought is the order of the day. It’s more cognitively-expensive to think about what the deeper implications of hitting “send” would be. However, now would be a good time to do so.
Social media apps are increasingly providing us opportunities to do just this. Banks could do the same. “Are you sure you want to withdraw all your savings?”
Providing users a “cooling off period” for impactful moments now can allow for better decisions that help us more in our future.
Whilst we all like to think we make rational, optimal decisions, sometimes, our impulses get the better of us.
In an attempt to preserve our cognitive capacity, we make what’s called fast, reactionary “System 1” judgements.
These might not be very good at all for us.
Let me explain.
Consider you’re stressed out after a long day, and launch your favourite social media app to unwind. You see someone sharing a wild conspiracy theory that you know to be untrue.
You’re angry, and quickly write out a frustrated comment that criticises this person, using strong language that would offend.
At this point, hitting “send” would cause a lot of damage you can’t come back from.
This is where our slower “System 2” thinking becomes vital.
Here, reflective thought is the order of the day. It’s more cognitively-expensive to think about what the deeper implications of hitting “send” would be. However, now would be a good time to do so.
Social media apps are increasingly providing us opportunities to do just this. Banks could do the same. “Are you sure you want to withdraw all your savings?”
Providing users a “cooling off period” for impactful moments now can allow for better decisions that help us more in our future.
2,064 male students from 9 schools in Chicago were enrolled in a two-year-long program that encouraged system-two slow thinking on how to manage situations of conflict.
Participation in the program reduced total arrests by 35% and violent crime arrests by 50%.
Add a little friction.
We constantly weigh up effort vs rewards, so seeing one long sign-up form can lead us to make a fast system-one decision not to do so.
A process that’s Chunked, features reflective Goal Primes and clearly shows the product benefits will work better.
Provide warnings for damaging decisions.
Instagram have launched "comment warning", live-analysing a comment and notifying of potential offense, without removing the Autonomy to post. This allows for reflection and avoids Reactance.
Build in reflective periods for big decisions.
Knee-jerk, short-term decisions can harm our longer-term goals. E.g., financial firms can help us make smarter decisions about withdrawing all our savings by building in a reflective delay, especially when such decisions conflict with our prior Commitments and goals.
Product Development
Goal Priming
When we’re reminded of our aims, we're more motivated to reach them
The food choices of 89 people both dieting and not dieting were analyzed in a cafe. Diners were given a menu with either information highlighting low-calorie options or not (the control).
Results showed that dieters primed with the reminder of their future goal consistently made healthier food choices than unprimed dieters.
Who is the target group?
They could be people who are motivated to protect the environment, improve productivity at work or improve the quality of their lives. Note: they must have already stated a desire for this goal. Your prime will merely aim to nudge their existing Commitment to meeting their own aspirations.
Where can you trigger these long-term motivations?
As well as environment, timing also matters, so make sure that you do so very close to the actual decision point, i.e. at the start of a meeting, at the ordering counter or on the inside of a restroom door.
Boost with the Spacing Effect.
What's the specific behaviour that you're allowing them to perform to help move them towards their long term goal?
It has to be obvious and easy to do, such as clearly identifying an eco-friendly substitute, bolting on a salad or opting for an equally-priced, dairy-free option.
Experience
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
You’re walking down the street. Consider two realities:
A: You unexpectedly find $10 in your pocket.
You feel positively-surprised!
Or:
B: You left the house with $10 in your pocket.
But you reach in and it’s gone.
The pain you feel from its loss is greater than the good feeling of finding it.
Prospect Theory explains that our perceptions of value differ based on how something is framed, and losing things feels worse than getting them feels good.
As one of the grand concepts that underpinned a lot of the early ideas within behavioral science, Prospect Theory is a beast with many aspects to it, such as Loss Aversion, Framing, Certainty, and Risk.
But for now, take your practical understanding a step further by reading the Aggregation Effect and Segregation Effect Nuggets.
You’re walking down the street. Consider two realities:
A: You unexpectedly find $10 in your pocket.
You feel positively-surprised!
Or:
B: You left the house with $10 in your pocket.
But you reach in and it’s gone.
The pain you feel from its loss is greater than the good feeling of finding it.
Prospect Theory explains that our perceptions of value differ based on how something is framed, and losing things feels worse than getting them feels good.
As one of the grand concepts that underpinned a lot of the early ideas within behavioral science, Prospect Theory is a beast with many aspects to it, such as Loss Aversion, Framing, Certainty, and Risk.
But for now, take your practical understanding a step further by reading the Aggregation Effect and Segregation Effect Nuggets.
Prospect theory is explained with a graph. Negative losses and positive gains recorded on the horizontal are set against a vertical intensity of feeling for those losses or gains.
As we gain more, we feel less for each gain. In contrast, even a small pain (shown in red) feels a lot more negative than an equal-sized gain feels good.
Package pain. Consumers will feel less overall pain from any costs incurred when you package and deliver them all together rather than when they're felt as separate, smaller pains.
Spread out rewards.
Instead of offering larger, chunkier benefits to consumers, break these down into smaller pieces, spreading them out across time.
$10 given 4 times feels more valuable overall than $40 given once.
Offer mixed product bundles.
We feel less good with each thing we consume. Therefore, the first can of soda tastes better than the fourth.
This means we'd get more complimentary value from a bag of chips instead.
Look for ways to offer relevant, mixed product bundles to offset diminishing consumer sensitivity.
Experience
Feedback Loops
We look for information that provides clarity on our actions
City Planners of Garden Grove, California installed Active Radar Speed Signs at 5 locations to provide real-time feedback on the speed of 58,000 drivers. LEDs would also flash if drivers exceeded speed limits by more than 5MPH.
After installation of the feedback systems, average speed dropped 22% from 44 to 34mph.
First, determine the behavior to change. Measure, capture and store the relevant data.
Communicate it back to the individual in a relevant, context-sensitive way that ultimately provokes an emotional reaction.
Provide clear consequences for action or inaction. It’s critical to get the right balance between not being too subtle and not being too intrusive or authoritarian (which we filter out).
Lastly, allow for opportunities to immediately rectify the behavior - which should also be tracked - completing the loop and eventually changing the behavior pattern. Remember to reward compliance as much as you penalize inaction to increase effectiveness.
Conversion
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Information has a wonderful way of looking very different, depending on how it’s communicated.
From turning glasses half empty into those half-full, as Designers, we have a great role to play in using framing to help people see things differently and hopefully, for the better too.
Framing is one of your most powerful behavioral tools. Everything can be reframed, depending on what you want.
For example, online second-hand clothing marketplace Vinted has devised a clever strategy to reframe the commonly-used “Service Fee” as a “Buyer protection fee”.
By reframing it as buyer protection and clearly communicating how this amount is calculated, this assurance goes beyond merely paying for the item.
Now, customers will also feel confident that they’re taking extra steps towards safeguarding their purchase.
Information has a wonderful way of looking very different, depending on how it’s communicated.
From turning glasses half empty into those half-full, as Designers, we have a great role to play in using framing to help people see things differently and hopefully, for the better too.
Framing is one of your most powerful behavioral tools. Everything can be reframed, depending on what you want.
For example, online second-hand clothing marketplace Vinted has devised a clever strategy to reframe the commonly-used “Service Fee” as a “Buyer protection fee”.
By reframing it as buyer protection and clearly communicating how this amount is calculated, this assurance goes beyond merely paying for the item.
Now, customers will also feel confident that they’re taking extra steps towards safeguarding their purchase.
96 people were told they’d be given some ground beef to taste, with half told it’d be “25% fat” (negative frame) and half told it’d be “75% lean” (positive frame). They were then asked to rate the quality of the beef out of 7.
Those presented with a positive frame rated the beef as higher quality than those presented with a negative one.
Create a frame using context, words or imagery to help others to see things according to your needs.
Wildly different perceptions are made possible by reframing the same evidence.
Reframe statistics as factually-accurate positives against competitors.
Facts are dramatically reinterpreted when set amongst different data.
• Create an opportunity to act.
We’re more likely to take up a special offer when the marketing message is framed as a potential loss than a gain (Gamliel and Herstein, 2012).
Conversion
Fresh Start Effect
We're more likely to stick to habits made at the start of new time periods
11,912 members of a gym were surveyed over 442 days for their attendance.
Results showed that, next to the baseline, the probability of people going to the gym increased at the beginning of the week, month and semester, showing our higher in-built level of motivation at the start of new time periods.
Motivate around fresh start moments.
How can you help people achieve their dreams by communicating around multiple time chunks, such as the start of the week, month or year, or even personal events like birthdays, graduations or job changes?
Target one-shots.
Fresh starts are particularly good at helping people make one-off decisions that perhaps they'd been delaying, such as getting that flu jab. What single task can you help people do around new time periods?
Use to overcome failures.
There are countless fresh start opportunities to help people who have let good habits slip. Frame it as a "new you", which gives an opportunity to separate themselves from past failures. Get them started by being empathic and having them Commit to a Tiny Habit.
Loyalty
Tiny Habits
We're more likely to reach goals when broken down into smaller ones
96 women were given fitness trackers and asked to either walk 10,000 steps per day or walk a bit more each day than the average of their own last 9 days. This equated to a lower number of steps than the 10,000 group but had the benefit of adapting to each person’s own step count.
Results showed that over 4 months, those with a smaller, adaptive goal walked far more than the 10,000 group.
Start very small.
We’re time and attention-poor, wanting results now. As one step up from Endowed Progress, what is the smallest, valuable task you can design for that affords a fast, positive Feedback Loop?
To increase long-term success, Tiny Habits creator BJ Fogg suggests using an existing behavior to trigger a new one by 'chaining' new tiny behaviors onto existing habits.
Keep the bigger goal front of mind.
People who’d completed a small exercise task were less likely to eat healthy food after, due to a short-term feeling of success (Fishbach et al., 2006). However, prompting a reminder of the larger Goal Prime of becoming fit removed this problem.
Time the reminder after tiny task success.
Make it adaptive.
A system that flexes with our fluctuating capacity (i.e. time or energy) will always work best. Understand users’ habitual patterns & weak points and design empathic experiences around these.
Loyalty
Endowed Progress Effect
We reach our goals faster when we have help getting started
300 customers at a car wash were split into two groups and given one of two different loyalty cards for a free wash upon completion: either one with space for 8 stamps or one for 10 (with 2 spaces pre-stamped).
Despite both cards requiring the same amount of effort, completion of the non-pre-stamped 8 card over a 9-month period was only 19% whereas the pre-stamped 10-card was 34%.
Get them started. Endow progress with a fraction of points, stars or a brand-specific measure. Make sure you endow enough to motivate use, aiming for between 10-25% of the total effort required for the first reward. As well as helping with initial effort, make the reward itself substantial and meaningful to assist habit-forming.
Never endow at the end. The closer we are to a goal, the more we value our own internal efforts to complete it. Doing so on their behalf will devalue existing effort, perceived reward value and reduce loyalty strength.
Make it seamless. In Christmas 2013, 1 in 8 Americans got a Starbucks Gift Card. On redemption they were automatically endowed with progress in the form of loyalty stars, creating 1.5m new loyalty members as a result. How can you seamlessly channel gift customers through to your loyalty scheme?
Conversion
Zeigarnik Effect
Incomplete tasks weigh on our minds until done
47 subjects were given around 20 small, manual tasks to complete, one at a time. Experimenters randomly interrupted completion of half of these tasks. After, subjects were asked to recall as many tasks as possible.
There was a 90% higher recall of incomplete and interrupted tasks than those completed.
Make important task completion frictionless. If customers leave your site without finishing their order, make it effortlessly easy to get that completion feeling, such as allowing for completion with a single click, tap or swipe.
Focus on completion’s emotional release. Providing reward incentives for task completion actually demotivates consumers. Instead, remind them not just of the product they’ve not yet bought, but of the feelings that this ‘purchase task’ will unlock.
Make known campaigns incomplete and interactive. Greater familiarity with an advert increases consumer ability to complete an interrupted ad message. Active participation also boosts ad memory (Heller, 1956). So if your popular campaign’s reaching its end, consider a special second follow-up version that allows for active participation in completing the ad message.
Conversion
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
850,000 teachers' retirement plans were assessed. Each teacher's main decision was to divide their pension between two funds: one low risk (bonds) and one high risk (stocks). They could switch between the two at no cost.
Results found that despite the massive differences in rates of return between the two funds, only 20% ever switched from their initial fund allocation.
What's the status quo in your situation?
Build a strategy around identifying and removing the practical and emotional switching costs that are preventing change.
Make it exciting!
It isn't enough to just remove the barriers. Offer a Contrasting view of the net gain of the change, painting a clear, positive picture with a personalized Goal Prime showing them how their life will be better.
Make it effortless.
Use Foot In The Door with a Tiny Habit to help users take the first positive step.
Identify and work with a group of 'change-makers'; those with some Authority who are most ready to adopt and embrace change.
Share their positive Stories with others more averse.
Check your Defaults.
You’re setting them everywhere, sometimes without thinking. These strongly influence the status quo. What new behavioral goal are you looking to foster in your users? Update your defaults to suit.
Conversion
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
34 people were split into 3 groups and each told to unscramble a list of either rude, polite or neutral words. After, they were told to see the researcher, who was engaged in a fake discussion with a peer. They were then timed with how long it took before they interrupted.
63% of those primed with rude words interrupted within 10 minutes, compared to only 18% of the polite group.
Prime with words that highlight the positive emotional effect of using your goods or services. For example, Spotify could prime users of its Discover Weekly playlist by using words that highlight its uniqueness or repeat gift-giving benefits.
Combine with images Coca Cola created an advert in Italy called ‘Open the happy can’ that primed potential buyers with a simple smile that was revealed upon opening. This was done in order to create an associative link between happiness and drink consumption, as well as providing a means of positive feedback for the consumer.
Keep it subtle. Prime too aggressively and the effect will weaken, or even lead to an unwanted Contrast Effect, where we’ll subconsciously reject and seek out opposites to the prime.
Experience
Chunking
We process information better when put into small groups
48 people were shown 100 sets of numbers of different lengths, split up into a number of smaller chunks. After seeing each set, they were asked to recall the numbers in a memory test.
The results found that, on average, people were good at remembering about 7 numbers and 4 chunks before memory errors started kicking in.
Chunk for clarity.
Our short-term memory is limited, so whether you're designing a food menu or trying to share a new idea, prevent Analysis Paralysis by breaking information down into 3-5 smaller bites that are easier to process.
Chunk requests.
If you're asking for a lot of info from customers, how can you break the task into more manageable segments?
Data capture company, Typeform are a great example of this, turning the concept of chunking into a core USP for its data capture products.
Chunk for long-term understanding.
Boost knowledge retention by structuring each chunk learned to build upon what was learned in previous ones. Repeat past chunks to build a strong, modular connection between fragmented bouts of learning.
Language app, Duolingo does this in an engaging visual way.
Experience
Choice-Supportive Bias
We recall more of the positives of our choices over any negatives
80 people were asked to choose between two used cars with an equal number of positive and negative traits. Two days later, they had to recall which features were for their car and which were from the other.
The results showed that they incorrectly chose more positive features for their choice and more negatives for the car they didn’t choose.
Remind customers of their good choice.
Embrace rationalization and use this to help people feel great about their choices.
Post-purchase, don’t just send an order confirmation, send an order celebration, like Fitbit do. Finish on a Peak!
Use as a platform for further steps.
Choices can also be validated by unlocking a new set of actions.
Joining the club, getting drip-fed how-to guides, booking an event ticket or sharing a referral code are all tasks that help support previous choices. Harry’s does this very well with its shaving advice.
What next steps do you want a new customer to take?
• Prime and capture positive sentiment.
Send a follow-up email a short period of time after product use with a simple call-to-action, such as a one-click star rating button with Social Proof evidence.
Pricing
Zero Price Bias
We value something more when free over very cheap
243 people were split into four groups and asked about the attractiveness of one of two types of chocolate truffle at one of two prices (Hersheys at 0¢ or 1¢ or Lindt at 13¢ or 14¢).
Those in the zero-priced truffle group felt disproportionately more attracted to their truffle than those in all other truffle groups.
Replace very low cost with free.
Amazon famously rolled out free shipping in Europe, sales rose everywhere but France, where shipping was mistakenly set at 10¢. What small costs are you passing on to consumers?
In line with Prospect Theory, it may be better to bundle ‘the pain’ within a larger cost.
Communicate what is free.
Consider surfacing bundled, previously hidden value that you offer, actively highlighting the zero cost in marketing material and on invoices etc.
Nudge with small charges.
The flip side of zero-pricing is that incurring even a small cost quietly impacts our decisions.
If you're trying to change behaviour, imposing a small discomfort can disproportionately assist.
Branding
Devil Effect
Our perception of a single negative attribute unfairly bleeds into other unrelated areas
247 people were told of an NFL player endorsing a shoe brand and shown a news item of the player being guilty of a drug deal, of the brand faking employee insurance, or a no-news control. They were then asked to rate feelings towards both celebrity and product.
Products were found to suffer from worse perception after a bad celebrity act, but the celebrity was relatively untainted following a company failure.
The Devil is everywhere...
...and not particular to just humans, but also found within places, opinions, brands or symbols. In being Fast and Slow Thinkers, we look for shortcuts as to how the world is, and who to trust.
Be careful of your associations.
Think carefully about the connections you make and the potential risk of doing so. Consider the campaign by watch maker Swatch, themed around the Brexit referendum to design your own watch. Nobody wants to be reminded of painful division, especially when reduced to a quick sales opportunity.
Don't let the Devil get in your way.
We’re biased against a great idea from someone we don't like or a delicious recipe recommendation from someone with differing political views. If you discredit x just because of y, try to recognize the source of the devil and accept that we can hold many conflicting views and also be of great value to one other.
Branding
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
274 people were shown 10 t-shirts, split into 4 groups and then asked to rate the shirts on either likeability, casualness, colorfulness or how much it matched with a cap. They were then asked how fun the task was.
Those given the ability to express their like or dislike rated the task as much more fun than the other groups. Simply, we value ways to express how we feel.
Personalization pays.
Bold, scaleable self-expressive features increase loyalty and sales.
Coca-Cola’s #ShareaCoke campaign - switching out the product name for a person’s name - led to a 10% rise in 2014 sales and a 7% spike in Facebook growth.
An Australian store sold 400,000 customized jars of Nutella for $10 each, becoming their top seller.
Tie it back to emotions.
Though there are successes like Kraft Heinz personalized soup “Get Well Soon ___”, with consumers happy to spend five times more, know that personalization has upper bounds on price and has less impact as it becomes more common.
Like Heinz, the smartest brands will tie personalization to underlying product emotions - care and sympathy in this case.
What emotions do you want end consumers to feel? Use personalization to help express these publicly.
Conversion
Competition
We strive with and against one another for limited resources and status
121 students were shown one of 3 adverts for watch brand Swatch. Either a control with no sales event, a limited-time sale (6 days) or one limited in quantity available (100) triggering competition. They were then asked how likely they’d be to buy the watch.
Those in the competition condition were more likely to buy than those under time pressure.
A little competition can be fun.
We are naturally competitive; where there are numbers, there are games. And though it shouldn't be the only driver of behavior change, subtle uses with measurable goals, leaderboards and appropriate Rewards can provide benefit. What positive behaviors do you want to encourage? Tell the Story of why the competition exists to help motivate further. Ensure that the competition also aligns with others' own aspirations.
Allow everyone to ‘succeed’, regardless of ability.
Bad competition creates clear winners and losers, which can demotivate the latter and reduce behavior change. Good competition includes ways to celebrate all efforts to reach a goal. Be sensitive to our desire to compare, e.g. only show individuals their relative place in a leaderboard.
Make competition team-based.
Too much competition can reduce internal motivation. However competing as broader teams can prevent this. Collaboration is a powerful tool to use with competition to foster new collective norms around the intended behavior.