
Once we’ve made a public statement, we make consistent decisions to support it
Making written or verbal declarations greatly affects our future behavior as we aim to appear rational and avoid being seen as inconsistent by others.
Pallak et al. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1, 235-253.
Impact

The study
The studies
212 Iowan households had their energy use tracked for a year with the aim of reducing it. Half who agreed to reduce were told their name would be shown publicly in the local paper.
Those publicly committing demonstrated a 15.5% larger average reduction in energy use over winter.

212 Iowan households had their energy use tracked for a year with the aim of reducing it. Half who agreed to reduce were told their name would be shown publicly in the local paper.
Those publicly committing demonstrated a 15.5% larger average reduction in energy use over winter.

Pallak et al. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1, 235-253.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Anchor any request with a leading question that supports others’ positive judgements of themselves or their past decisions.

Start with a small request that allows the respondent to remain consistent with their answer to this question. Commitments are self-reinforcing and build over time, so build slowly on this initial commitment with further, larger requests such as a future product purchase.

Make it public. Declaring an opinion to others on a subject or product will compel consumers to remain consistent with and even strengthen this opinion in future, especially if written down. e.g. asking others to tweet why they love a product will strengthen attachment to it, as well as fostering social proof for others.

Boundary conditions
Future questions

Once we’ve made a public statement, we make consistent decisions to support it
Making written or verbal declarations greatly affects our future behavior as we aim to appear rational and avoid being seen as inconsistent by others.
Pallak et al. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1, 235-253.
The study
Impact

The study
The studies
212 Iowan households had their energy use tracked for a year with the aim of reducing it. Half who agreed to reduce were told their name would be shown publicly in the local paper.
Those publicly committing demonstrated a 15.5% larger average reduction in energy use over winter.

212 Iowan households had their energy use tracked for a year with the aim of reducing it. Half who agreed to reduce were told their name would be shown publicly in the local paper.
Those publicly committing demonstrated a 15.5% larger average reduction in energy use over winter.

Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Anchor any request with a leading question that supports others’ positive judgements of themselves or their past decisions.

Start with a small request that allows the respondent to remain consistent with their answer to this question. Commitments are self-reinforcing and build over time, so build slowly on this initial commitment with further, larger requests such as a future product purchase.

Make it public. Declaring an opinion to others on a subject or product will compel consumers to remain consistent with and even strengthen this opinion in future, especially if written down. e.g. asking others to tweet why they love a product will strengthen attachment to it, as well as fostering social proof for others.

Boundary conditions
Future questions
Pallak et al. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1, 235-253.

Once we’ve made a public statement, we make consistent decisions to support it
Making written or verbal declarations greatly affects our future behavior as we aim to appear rational and avoid being seen as inconsistent by others.
The study
212 Iowan households had their energy use tracked for a year with the aim of reducing it. Half who agreed to reduce were told their name would be shown publicly in the local paper.
Those publicly committing demonstrated a 15.5% larger average reduction in energy use over winter.

Pallak et al. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual, Volume 1, 235-253.

Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply

Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations

Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good

Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received

Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it

Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others

Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us

Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard

IKEA Effect
We’ll pay disproportionately more for something we’ve helped create

Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply

Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations

Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good

Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received

Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it

Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others

Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us

Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard

IKEA Effect
We’ll pay disproportionately more for something we’ve helped create
Simple one-time payment
Ex-VAT