We have a strong tendency to comply with those in charge
Parent, boss or judge: we trust and accept the decisions of those with relative expertise. However, conformity differs across both culture and age.
Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, 47-61.
The study
153 New York pedestrians were approached by someone dressed as either a civilian, a milkman or a police officer and were asked to help out a stranger by covering the cost of his / her parked car ticket.
The more authoritarian the uniform, the higher the chance they’d give the money. The civilian succeeded only 33% of the time, whereas the police officer managed 89%.
Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, 47-61.
Key Takeaways
Determine an authority figure with relative expertise in relation to the group and behavior you’re looking to influence. Ensure that the individual is credible and trustworthy.
Communicate their authority clearly. For instance, using authority indicators like “Doctor,” “Judge,” “Award-winning” etc. Complementing this with a suitably-dressed photo of said individual will make any request much more effective. Add a quotation too.
Compliance varies depending on demographics. Older people are more compliant than younger people, for instance. For the young, use culturally-relevant aspirational models to mask authority whilst also nudging desired behavior.
In further detail
We have a strong tendency to comply with those in charge
Parent, boss or judge: we trust and accept the decisions of those with relative expertise. However, conformity differs across both culture and age.
Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, 47-61.
The study
153 New York pedestrians were approached by someone dressed as either a civilian, a milkman or a police officer and were asked to help out a stranger by covering the cost of his / her parked car ticket.
The more authoritarian the uniform, the higher the chance they’d give the money. The civilian succeeded only 33% of the time, whereas the police officer managed 89%.
Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, 47-61.
Key Takeaways
Determine an authority figure with relative expertise in relation to the group and behavior you’re looking to influence. Ensure that the individual is credible and trustworthy.
Communicate their authority clearly. For instance, using authority indicators like “Doctor,” “Judge,” “Award-winning” etc. Complementing this with a suitably-dressed photo of said individual will make any request much more effective. Add a quotation too.
Compliance varies depending on demographics. Older people are more compliant than younger people, for instance. For the young, use culturally-relevant aspirational models to mask authority whilst also nudging desired behavior.
In further detail
We have a strong tendency to comply with those in charge
The study
153 New York pedestrians were approached by someone dressed as either a civilian, a milkman or a police officer and were asked to help out a stranger by covering the cost of his / her parked car ticket.
The more authoritarian the uniform, the higher the chance they’d give the money. The civilian succeeded only 33% of the time, whereas the police officer managed 89%.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown