We’re less likely to complete a task with each step added
The more you can reduce the perceived effort in your user’s path, the less daunting a task feels and the greater the possibility it will be completed.
Choi, James J, David Laibson, and Brigitte C Madrian. 2009. “Reducing the Complexity Costs of 401 (k) Participation through Quick Enrollment.” In Developments in the Economics of Aging, 57–82. University of Chicago Press.
The study
733 new employees of a health company used a single opt-in process to subscribe to a retirement plan. Results were compared to a multi-step phone process used with 455 and 407 employees from the two previous years.
Participation rates were 5% after one month and 8% after three months. With the new process, they rose to 19% and 35% respectively.
Choi, James J, David Laibson, and Brigitte C Madrian. 2009. “Reducing the Complexity Costs of 401 (k) Participation through Quick Enrollment.” In Developments in the Economics of Aging, 57–82. University of Chicago Press.
Key Takeaways
Perform a friction audit.
Identify all the hurdles and delays your user may feel while using your product and attempt to minimise them. How many barriers to a near-effortless user experience can you find?
Adding friction can help people from making mistakes.
Add barriers to counter System 1 mode, prompting users for conscious reflection to validate important information (e.g. monetary transactions). What strategic friction can you create?
Add friction to make waiting times feel shorter.
Houston airport reduced the number of luggage waiting times complaints by moving the luggage area further away so that passengers spent more time walking and less time waiting.
Remove friction but highlight effort.
Our willingness to pay for something increases by knowing how much work is done for us. We pay more for a cup of coffee if we see the barista working on it for several minutes.
In further detail
We’re less likely to complete a task with each step added
The more you can reduce the perceived effort in your user’s path, the less daunting a task feels and the greater the possibility it will be completed.
Choi, James J, David Laibson, and Brigitte C Madrian. 2009. “Reducing the Complexity Costs of 401 (k) Participation through Quick Enrollment.” In Developments in the Economics of Aging, 57–82. University of Chicago Press.
The study
733 new employees of a health company used a single opt-in process to subscribe to a retirement plan. Results were compared to a multi-step phone process used with 455 and 407 employees from the two previous years.
Participation rates were 5% after one month and 8% after three months. With the new process, they rose to 19% and 35% respectively.
Choi, James J, David Laibson, and Brigitte C Madrian. 2009. “Reducing the Complexity Costs of 401 (k) Participation through Quick Enrollment.” In Developments in the Economics of Aging, 57–82. University of Chicago Press.
Key Takeaways
Perform a friction audit.
Identify all the hurdles and delays your user may feel while using your product and attempt to minimise them. How many barriers to a near-effortless user experience can you find?
Adding friction can help people from making mistakes.
Add barriers to counter System 1 mode, prompting users for conscious reflection to validate important information (e.g. monetary transactions). What strategic friction can you create?
Add friction to make waiting times feel shorter.
Houston airport reduced the number of luggage waiting times complaints by moving the luggage area further away so that passengers spent more time walking and less time waiting.
Remove friction but highlight effort.
Our willingness to pay for something increases by knowing how much work is done for us. We pay more for a cup of coffee if we see the barista working on it for several minutes.
In further detail
We’re less likely to complete a task with each step added
The study
733 new employees of a health company used a single opt-in process to subscribe to a retirement plan. Results were compared to a multi-step phone process used with 455 and 407 employees from the two previous years.
Participation rates were 5% after one month and 8% after three months. With the new process, they rose to 19% and 35% respectively.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown