Making a small commitment now makes us more likely to agree to a greater one later
A low cost, unthreatening technique that has the power to increase sales, donations and recruitment, as long as you follow a few rules…
Burger (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
The study
88 household individuals were split into three groups and asked to either wear a badge supporting a charity, asked to wear one along with another family member or not to wear at all. That same evening, all groups were then asked for a financial donation to the charity.
Those who were first asked the small request were far more likely to go on and donate money than those who weren’t.
Burger (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Key Takeaways
Start with a question promoting reflection on one’s values. Their answers will create a desire to be consistent with their beliefs.
Have people perform a small related action. e.g. People who put a small “Drive carefully” sign in their window are more likely to follow the instruction than those who merely say they will. Frame it as a social norm.
Make the target request a continuation of the initial one. The more similar the activity, the greater success. Also balance your request sizes. If the initial request is too big, people won’t do it, never getting to the target request. But too-small tasks will widen the gulf between the two.
In further detail
Making a small commitment now makes us more likely to agree to a greater one later
A low cost, unthreatening technique that has the power to increase sales, donations and recruitment, as long as you follow a few rules…
Burger (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
The study
88 household individuals were split into three groups and asked to either wear a badge supporting a charity, asked to wear one along with another family member or not to wear at all. That same evening, all groups were then asked for a financial donation to the charity.
Those who were first asked the small request were far more likely to go on and donate money than those who weren’t.
Burger (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Key Takeaways
Start with a question promoting reflection on one’s values. Their answers will create a desire to be consistent with their beliefs.
Have people perform a small related action. e.g. People who put a small “Drive carefully” sign in their window are more likely to follow the instruction than those who merely say they will. Frame it as a social norm.
Make the target request a continuation of the initial one. The more similar the activity, the greater success. Also balance your request sizes. If the initial request is too big, people won’t do it, never getting to the target request. But too-small tasks will widen the gulf between the two.
In further detail
Making a small commitment now makes us more likely to agree to a greater one later
The study
88 household individuals were split into three groups and asked to either wear a badge supporting a charity, asked to wear one along with another family member or not to wear at all. That same evening, all groups were then asked for a financial donation to the charity.
Those who were first asked the small request were far more likely to go on and donate money than those who weren’t.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown