We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Status Quo stops change. It's driven by our desire to be consistent with past actions, by the Sunk Costs that mount and the Loss Aversion that’s hard to overcome.
Samuelson & Zeckhauser (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty.
The study
850,000 teachers' retirement plans were assessed. Each teacher's main decision was to divide their pension between two funds: one low risk (bonds) and one high risk (stocks). They could switch between the two at no cost.
Results found that despite the massive differences in rates of return between the two funds, only 20% ever switched from their initial fund allocation.
Samuelson & Zeckhauser (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty.
Key Takeaways
What's the status quo in your situation?
Build a strategy around identifying and removing the practical and emotional switching costs that are preventing change.
Make it exciting!
It isn't enough to just remove the barriers. Offer a Contrasting view of the net gain of the change, painting a clear, positive picture with a personalized Goal Prime showing them how their life will be better.
Make it effortless.
Use Foot In The Door with a Tiny Habit to help users take the first positive step.
Identify and work with a group of 'change-makers'; those with some Authority who are most ready to adopt and embrace change.
Share their positive Stories with others more averse.
Check your Defaults.
You’re setting them everywhere, sometimes without thinking. These strongly influence the status quo. What new behavioral goal are you looking to foster in your users? Update your defaults to suit.
In further detail
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Status Quo stops change. It's driven by our desire to be consistent with past actions, by the Sunk Costs that mount and the Loss Aversion that’s hard to overcome.
Samuelson & Zeckhauser (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty.
The study
850,000 teachers' retirement plans were assessed. Each teacher's main decision was to divide their pension between two funds: one low risk (bonds) and one high risk (stocks). They could switch between the two at no cost.
Results found that despite the massive differences in rates of return between the two funds, only 20% ever switched from their initial fund allocation.
Samuelson & Zeckhauser (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty.
Key Takeaways
What's the status quo in your situation?
Build a strategy around identifying and removing the practical and emotional switching costs that are preventing change.
Make it exciting!
It isn't enough to just remove the barriers. Offer a Contrasting view of the net gain of the change, painting a clear, positive picture with a personalized Goal Prime showing them how their life will be better.
Make it effortless.
Use Foot In The Door with a Tiny Habit to help users take the first positive step.
Identify and work with a group of 'change-makers'; those with some Authority who are most ready to adopt and embrace change.
Share their positive Stories with others more averse.
Check your Defaults.
You’re setting them everywhere, sometimes without thinking. These strongly influence the status quo. What new behavioral goal are you looking to foster in your users? Update your defaults to suit.
In further detail
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
The study
850,000 teachers' retirement plans were assessed. Each teacher's main decision was to divide their pension between two funds: one low risk (bonds) and one high risk (stocks). They could switch between the two at no cost.
Results found that despite the massive differences in rates of return between the two funds, only 20% ever switched from their initial fund allocation.
In detail
How new web browser Arc lets you "create your own internet" with its Boosts feature
Read moreScarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown