We strive with and against one another for limited resources and status
We can’t avoid comparing ourselves to others. And once we can compare, we’re driven to compete to enhance our relative sense of self-worth.
Swab & Johnson (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
The study
121 students were shown one of 3 adverts for watch brand Swatch. Either a control with no sales event, a limited-time sale (6 days) or one limited in quantity available (100) triggering competition. They were then asked how likely they’d be to buy the watch.
Those in the competition condition were more likely to buy than those under time pressure.
Swab & Johnson (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Key Takeaways
A little competition can be fun.
We are naturally competitive; where there are numbers, there are games. And though it shouldn't be the only driver of behavior change, subtle uses with measurable goals, leaderboards and appropriate Rewards can provide benefit. What positive behaviors do you want to encourage? Tell the Story of why the competition exists to help motivate further. Ensure that the competition also aligns with others' own aspirations.
Allow everyone to ‘succeed’, regardless of ability.
Bad competition creates clear winners and losers, which can demotivate the latter and reduce behavior change. Good competition includes ways to celebrate all efforts to reach a goal. Be sensitive to our desire to compare, e.g. only show individuals their relative place in a leaderboard.
Make competition team-based.
Too much competition can reduce internal motivation. However competing as broader teams can prevent this. Collaboration is a powerful tool to use with competition to foster new collective norms around the intended behavior.
In further detail
We strive with and against one another for limited resources and status
We can’t avoid comparing ourselves to others. And once we can compare, we’re driven to compete to enhance our relative sense of self-worth.
Swab & Johnson (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
The study
121 students were shown one of 3 adverts for watch brand Swatch. Either a control with no sales event, a limited-time sale (6 days) or one limited in quantity available (100) triggering competition. They were then asked how likely they’d be to buy the watch.
Those in the competition condition were more likely to buy than those under time pressure.
Swab & Johnson (2019). Steel sharpens steel: A review of multilevel competitiveness in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Key Takeaways
A little competition can be fun.
We are naturally competitive; where there are numbers, there are games. And though it shouldn't be the only driver of behavior change, subtle uses with measurable goals, leaderboards and appropriate Rewards can provide benefit. What positive behaviors do you want to encourage? Tell the Story of why the competition exists to help motivate further. Ensure that the competition also aligns with others' own aspirations.
Allow everyone to ‘succeed’, regardless of ability.
Bad competition creates clear winners and losers, which can demotivate the latter and reduce behavior change. Good competition includes ways to celebrate all efforts to reach a goal. Be sensitive to our desire to compare, e.g. only show individuals their relative place in a leaderboard.
Make competition team-based.
Too much competition can reduce internal motivation. However competing as broader teams can prevent this. Collaboration is a powerful tool to use with competition to foster new collective norms around the intended behavior.
In further detail
We strive with and against one another for limited resources and status
The study
121 students were shown one of 3 adverts for watch brand Swatch. Either a control with no sales event, a limited-time sale (6 days) or one limited in quantity available (100) triggering competition. They were then asked how likely they’d be to buy the watch.
Those in the competition condition were more likely to buy than those under time pressure.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown