Our judgements are heavily influenced by what comes to mind more easily
Though what naturally comes to mind is sometimes more likely, our beliefs can get heavily biased, causing poor, potentially devastating decisions.
Mamede et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. Jama, 304(11).
The study
36 medical students were first asked to diagnose six clinical cases (Phase 1). They were then asked to diagnose a further eight, four of which were similar to Phase 1, but were actually different (Phase 2). Their accuracy for successful diagnosis was rated out of four.
Average diagnosis scores were 17.5% lower for Phase 2 cases that were similar to those in Phase 1.
Mamede et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. Jama, 304(11).
Key Takeaways
Create pre-experiences.
During product development sessions, prime attendees with prototypes to first tell a detailed story of an imagined future. This will increase innovative ideas by reducing both incremental thinking (Liedtka, 2015) and inferior ideas brought about through Ownership Bias and any Sunk Costs.
Conduct reflective reviews.
After results are in from product experiments, reviewing the specific causes behind both failures and successes is critical. This will help you understand any assumptions or misdiagnosis brought about by merely relying on what comes easily to mind (Ellis and Davidi, 2005).
Include real customers in retrospectives.
Combining reflective reviews with real customer feedback will boost team performance (Schollaert, 2009) and help suppress the perils of your team's own Confirmation Bias.
In further detail
Our judgements are heavily influenced by what comes to mind more easily
Though what naturally comes to mind is sometimes more likely, our beliefs can get heavily biased, causing poor, potentially devastating decisions.
Mamede et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. Jama, 304(11).
The study
36 medical students were first asked to diagnose six clinical cases (Phase 1). They were then asked to diagnose a further eight, four of which were similar to Phase 1, but were actually different (Phase 2). Their accuracy for successful diagnosis was rated out of four.
Average diagnosis scores were 17.5% lower for Phase 2 cases that were similar to those in Phase 1.
Mamede et al. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. Jama, 304(11).
Key Takeaways
Create pre-experiences.
During product development sessions, prime attendees with prototypes to first tell a detailed story of an imagined future. This will increase innovative ideas by reducing both incremental thinking (Liedtka, 2015) and inferior ideas brought about through Ownership Bias and any Sunk Costs.
Conduct reflective reviews.
After results are in from product experiments, reviewing the specific causes behind both failures and successes is critical. This will help you understand any assumptions or misdiagnosis brought about by merely relying on what comes easily to mind (Ellis and Davidi, 2005).
Include real customers in retrospectives.
Combining reflective reviews with real customer feedback will boost team performance (Schollaert, 2009) and help suppress the perils of your team's own Confirmation Bias.
In further detail
Our judgements are heavily influenced by what comes to mind more easily
The study
36 medical students were first asked to diagnose six clinical cases (Phase 1). They were then asked to diagnose a further eight, four of which were similar to Phase 1, but were actually different (Phase 2). Their accuracy for successful diagnosis was rated out of four.
Average diagnosis scores were 17.5% lower for Phase 2 cases that were similar to those in Phase 1.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown