Our perception of a single negative attribute unfairly bleeds into other unrelated areas
This dangerous tendency can tear down great ideas or people in our minds simply because they have an association with something we don’t like.
White, Goddard & Wilbur (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. Intl Journal of Retail & Distribution Mngmnt.
The study
247 people were told of an NFL player endorsing a shoe brand and shown a news item of the player being guilty of a drug deal, of the brand faking employee insurance, or a no-news control. They were then asked to rate feelings towards both celebrity and product.
Products were found to suffer from worse perception after a bad celebrity act, but the celebrity was relatively untainted following a company failure.
White, Goddard & Wilbur (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. Intl Journal of Retail & Distribution Mngmnt.
Key Takeaways
The Devil is everywhere...
...and not particular to just humans, but also found within places, opinions, brands or symbols. In being Fast and Slow Thinkers, we look for shortcuts as to how the world is, and who to trust.
Be careful of your associations.
Think carefully about the connections you make and the potential risk of doing so. Consider the campaign by watch maker Swatch, themed around the Brexit referendum to design your own watch. Nobody wants to be reminded of painful division, especially when reduced to a quick sales opportunity.
Don't let the Devil get in your way.
We’re biased against a great idea from someone we don't like or a delicious recipe recommendation from someone with differing political views. If you discredit x just because of y, try to recognize the source of the devil and accept that we can hold many conflicting views and also be of great value to one other.
In further detail
Our perception of a single negative attribute unfairly bleeds into other unrelated areas
This dangerous tendency can tear down great ideas or people in our minds simply because they have an association with something we don’t like.
White, Goddard & Wilbur (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. Intl Journal of Retail & Distribution Mngmnt.
The study
247 people were told of an NFL player endorsing a shoe brand and shown a news item of the player being guilty of a drug deal, of the brand faking employee insurance, or a no-news control. They were then asked to rate feelings towards both celebrity and product.
Products were found to suffer from worse perception after a bad celebrity act, but the celebrity was relatively untainted following a company failure.
White, Goddard & Wilbur (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. Intl Journal of Retail & Distribution Mngmnt.
Key Takeaways
The Devil is everywhere...
...and not particular to just humans, but also found within places, opinions, brands or symbols. In being Fast and Slow Thinkers, we look for shortcuts as to how the world is, and who to trust.
Be careful of your associations.
Think carefully about the connections you make and the potential risk of doing so. Consider the campaign by watch maker Swatch, themed around the Brexit referendum to design your own watch. Nobody wants to be reminded of painful division, especially when reduced to a quick sales opportunity.
Don't let the Devil get in your way.
We’re biased against a great idea from someone we don't like or a delicious recipe recommendation from someone with differing political views. If you discredit x just because of y, try to recognize the source of the devil and accept that we can hold many conflicting views and also be of great value to one other.
In further detail
Our perception of a single negative attribute unfairly bleeds into other unrelated areas
The study
247 people were told of an NFL player endorsing a shoe brand and shown a news item of the player being guilty of a drug deal, of the brand faking employee insurance, or a no-news control. They were then asked to rate feelings towards both celebrity and product.
Products were found to suffer from worse perception after a bad celebrity act, but the celebrity was relatively untainted following a company failure.
In detail
Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply
Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations
Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good
Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received
Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we gain it
Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others
Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us
Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard
Anchoring
What we see first affects our judgement of everything thereafter
Autonomy Bias
We have a deep-seated need to control our situations
Fast & Slow Thinking
We make knee-jerk spontaneous decisions that can cause regretful damage
Status Quo Bias
We tend to stick with our previous choices, even if the alternatives might be better
Dynamic Norms
We’re more likely to change if we can see a new behavior developing
Round Pricing Preference
We prefer and trust whole numbers over those ending in a 9
Salience
Our choices are determined by the information we're shown