
We’re more likely to buy B over A by adding C to make B look more attractive
Every product added to a range affects the comparative value and choice made between the products. Used well, decoys are highly persuasive.
Huber et al. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research.
Impact

The study
The studies
153 people were asked to choose between a 5-star restaurant 25 mins away and a 3-star restaurant 5 mins away. A third decoy restaurant option was then added of 4-stars at 35 mins away.
This decoy shifted preferences from the closer, cheaper restaurant towards the 5-star option.

153 people were asked to choose between a 5-star restaurant 25 mins away and a 3-star restaurant 5 mins away. A third decoy restaurant option was then added of 4-stars at 35 mins away.
This decoy shifted preferences from the closer, cheaper restaurant towards the 5-star option.

Huber et al. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research.
Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Determine your target.
What is the product you want to sell more of, next to a lower-margin competing product? Build your decoy product around this with a price or attributes that inadvertently highlight the target's attractiveness.

Don't overwhelm.
Offering too much choice or highlighting too many competing attributes where neither option is clearly more attractive will trigger Analysis Paralysis, making consumers' decision processes more difficult.
How is your target clearly more attractive?

Test different decoy values to optimize the effect.
Huber et al., (2014) suggest that decoys work best when it’s really easy and quick to see the dominant product, when pre-decoy desire is roughly split between target and competitor and when people don’t strongly like / dislike the decoy.

Boundary conditions
Future questions

We’re more likely to buy B over A by adding C to make B look more attractive
Every product added to a range affects the comparative value and choice made between the products. Used well, decoys are highly persuasive.
Huber et al. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research.
The study
Impact

The study
The studies
153 people were asked to choose between a 5-star restaurant 25 mins away and a 3-star restaurant 5 mins away. A third decoy restaurant option was then added of 4-stars at 35 mins away.
This decoy shifted preferences from the closer, cheaper restaurant towards the 5-star option.

153 people were asked to choose between a 5-star restaurant 25 mins away and a 3-star restaurant 5 mins away. A third decoy restaurant option was then added of 4-stars at 35 mins away.
This decoy shifted preferences from the closer, cheaper restaurant towards the 5-star option.

Jerome's Expert View
Key Takeaways
Determine your target.
What is the product you want to sell more of, next to a lower-margin competing product? Build your decoy product around this with a price or attributes that inadvertently highlight the target's attractiveness.

Don't overwhelm.
Offering too much choice or highlighting too many competing attributes where neither option is clearly more attractive will trigger Analysis Paralysis, making consumers' decision processes more difficult.
How is your target clearly more attractive?

Test different decoy values to optimize the effect.
Huber et al., (2014) suggest that decoys work best when it’s really easy and quick to see the dominant product, when pre-decoy desire is roughly split between target and competitor and when people don’t strongly like / dislike the decoy.

Boundary conditions
Future questions
Huber et al. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research.

We’re more likely to buy B over A by adding C to make B look more attractive
Every product added to a range affects the comparative value and choice made between the products. Used well, decoys are highly persuasive.
The study
153 people were asked to choose between a 5-star restaurant 25 mins away and a 3-star restaurant 5 mins away. A third decoy restaurant option was then added of 4-stars at 35 mins away.
This decoy shifted preferences from the closer, cheaper restaurant towards the 5-star option.

Huber et al. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research.

Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply

Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations

Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good

Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received

Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it

Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others

Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us

Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard

IKEA Effect
We’ll pay disproportionately more for something we’ve helped create

Scarcity
We value things more when they’re in limited supply

Social Proof
We copy the behaviors of others, especially in unfamiliar situations

Prospect Theory
A loss hurts more than an equal gain feels good

Reciprocity
We’re hardwired to return kindness received

Framing
We make very different decisions based on how a fact is presented
Loss Aversion
We feel more negative when losing something than positive when we get it

Self-Expression
We constantly seek out ways to communicate our identity to others

Default Effect
We tend to accept the option pre-chosen for us

Priming
Our decisions are shaped by memories recalled from things just seen or heard

IKEA Effect
We’ll pay disproportionately more for something we’ve helped create
Simple one-time payment
Ex-VAT